UpSkill Sprint Consulting logoUpSkill Sprint Consulting Start a 15-min lesson

Engineering Tools · Complete User Guide · Releases 1–4

How to Use the Steel Phase & Transformation Explorer

Use the explorer to move from chemistry and processing conditions to predicted microstructure, properties, and performance. The tool now combines guided learning, equilibrium and kinetic transformation analysis, applied heat-treatment models, actual thermal-data analysis, measurement guidance, surface engineering, tempering, mechanical-property learning, metallography, solidification, and alloy-family modes.

Before you begin

Purpose and limits

The explorer is a teaching and preliminary engineering-screening environment. It is organized around the causal sequence:

Chemistry → Processing → Microstructure → Properties → Performance

Best uses

Learning metallurgy, comparing scenarios, phase-field identification, lever-rule practice, heat-treatment visualization, process-data screening, measurement troubleshooting, and early-stage hypothesis development.

Not a replacement for

Controlled standards, certified grade data, validated thermodynamic or kinetic software, calibrated measurements, laboratory testing, procedure qualification, material disposition, or responsible engineering approval.

Engineering caution: many calculations are deliberately simplified educational estimates. Never use the tool alone to release material, qualify a heat-treatment procedure, establish hazardous operating conditions, or approve a product.

Release 1

Guided start and display modes

Choose the question first

The Guided Start page routes you to the correct module. Select the question closest to your problem, such as:

  • What phases are present?
  • What happens during heating or cooling?
  • Will the centre of the section harden?
  • Is the austenitizing cycle adequate?
  • Which quench medium should be compared?
  • What does the uploaded thermal record show?
  • How should a thermocouple or pyrometer result be interpreted?
  • What case depth, tempering response, microstructure, or alloy-family behaviour should be expected?

Experience level

ModeWhat it emphasizesUse when
BeginnerPlain-language conclusions, key cautions, and fewer equations.You are learning the concept or need a quick interpretation.
EngineerFractions, assumptions, estimates, risk indicators, and verification needs.You are screening a process or preparing an analysis.
AdvancedModel details, equations, limitations, and complete comparison controls.You need to inspect the calculation logic and validity boundaries.

Interpretation basis

Use Equilibrium for Fe–Fe3C phase fields and lever-rule fractions. Use Rapid cooling for generalized ferrite, pearlite, bainite, and martensite trends. The rapid-cooling selection does not convert the equilibrium diagram into a CCT diagram; it changes how the scenario is interpreted.

Critical-temperature coach

  • Ae is the equilibrium critical temperature.
  • Ac is the observed transformation temperature during heating.
  • Ar is the observed transformation temperature during cooling.
  • Ms and Mf refer to martensite start and finish.

The heating- and cooling-rate shifts in the coach are teaching approximations, not process setpoints.

Core module

Equilibrium diagram

Plot and manage points

  1. Select metric or imperial temperature display.
  2. Enter carbon and temperature for P1.
  3. Use + Add point to create P2, P3, and additional comparisons.
  4. Select a row, marker, or result card to make that point active.
  5. Click or drag on the diagram to move only the active point.

Display controls

ControlFunction
Show tie lineDisplays two-phase boundary compositions used by the lever rule.
Spotlight active regionFades unrelated fields so the selected region is easier to interpret.
Snap to critical boundariesSnaps nearby points to A1, A3, Acm, or the eutectoid composition.
Connect points as pathLinks the listed points to illustrate a conceptual thermal path.

Lever rule

Inside a two-phase field, the tool estimates equilibrium mass fractions from the tie-line endpoints. For ferrite plus austenite:

fα = (Cγ − C₀) / (Cγ − Cα)    and    fγ = (C₀ − Cα) / (Cγ − Cα)

The schematic microstructure is educational. It does not reproduce actual grain morphology, inclusions, banding, or transformation kinetics.

Thermal-cycle builder

Heating and cooling paths

Select a preset—normalizing, annealing, spheroidizing, quench and temper, intercritical annealing, austempering, martempering—or build a custom cycle.

  1. Enter carbon.
  2. Add or remove cycle steps.
  3. Set target temperature, duration, and step type.
  4. Use Play, Pause, or the time slider.
  5. Review boundary crossings, the event timeline, and the live phase-state panel.

Crossing an equilibrium boundary does not prove instantaneous transformation. Time, chemistry, grain size, prior condition, section thickness, and cooling rate determine what actually forms.

Transformation kinetics

TTT and CCT

TTT

Use isothermal temperature and hold time to see how a constant-temperature path intersects idealized transformation start and finish curves.

CCT

Use continuous cooling rate and final temperature to compare ferrite, pearlite, bainite, martensite, and retained-austenite tendencies.

Chemistry from the Chemistry module shifts the generalized curves and critical temperatures. These are not certified, grade-specific diagrams.

Chemistry and causality

Chemistry, properties, and causal chain

Select an illustrative preset or enter verified heat chemistry. The module estimates CE IIW, Pcm, Ac1, Ac3, Ms, hardenability, weldability, and directional property trends.

OutputInterpretationPrimary caution
CE IIW / PcmWeldability and hydrogen-cracking screening.Applicability depends on product, thickness, procedure, heat input, and hydrogen control.
Ac1 / Ac3 / MsEmpirical critical-temperature estimates.Exact chemistry range and heating history matter.
Hardenability indexDirectional chemistry tendency.Do not replace measured Jominy data.
Property rangesDirectional hardness, strength, and elongation trends.Grain size, morphology, inclusions, precipitation, section size, tempering, and testing remain decisive.

The Guided Start causal dashboard updates the five-stage chain and warns when the active phase-diagram carbon differs from the chemistry-model carbon.

Release 2

Jominy and section-size hardenability

This module separates maximum hardness from depth of hardening.

  1. Confirm chemistry.
  2. Select round or plate geometry.
  3. Enter diameter or thickness.
  4. Select quench medium and agitation.
  5. Enter prior-austenite ASTM grain number and target hardness.
  6. Read the estimated Jominy curve and through-section result.

Outputs include equivalent Jominy distance, surface/quarter-depth/centre martensite, hardness, and effective target-hardness depth.

The result is a chemistry-calibrated teaching model, not an ASTM A255 calculation. Validate with measured Jominy curves and hardness traverses.

Release 2

Austenitization and grain-growth window

The module balances four competing needs: heat the core, form austenite, dissolve and homogenize carbides, and avoid excessive prior-austenite grain growth.

  • Set temperature, hold time, section size, heating rate, and initial grain size.
  • Select starting microstructure, carbide burden, and grain-boundary pinning.
  • Review core heat-through time, effective soak, dissolution, homogenization, final ASTM grain number, and grain-growth risk.
  • Use the heatmap to identify incomplete, balanced, and grain-growth-dominated regions.

A higher temperature can improve dissolution while accelerating grain growth. The preferred condition is a validated operating window, not the highest temperature or longest hold.

Release 2

Quench-medium and cracking-risk comparison

Compare still air, forced air/gas, conventional oil, accelerated oil, polymer solution, water, brine, and a molten-salt-bath analogue under common assumptions.

  • Set bath temperature, agitation, geometry, size, transfer delay, corner severity, and final temperature.
  • Review surface, quarter-depth, and centre cooling curves.
  • Compare 800→500 °C cooling rate, martensite, hardness, maximum thermal gradient, martensite mismatch, cracking risk, and distortion risk.
  • Use Apply to hardenability to transfer the selected setup.

Safety: this module does not provide operating instructions for hot oils, polymers, brines, molten salts, or high-temperature handling. Follow approved industrial procedures, SDS requirements, and engineered safeguards.

Release 3

Process-data analysis

Upload a thermal record

  1. Open Process Data.
  2. Drop or select a CSV, TSV, TXT, or semicolon-delimited file.
  3. Map the time and temperature columns.
  4. Select source time and temperature units.
  5. Adjust smoothing and arrest sensitivity.

The tool calculates the smoothed temperature history and:

Cooling rate = −dT/dt

Read the results

  • Average cooling rates for 800–500 °C and 500–300 °C.
  • Candidate thermal or transformation arrests.
  • Candidate proximity to Ac1, Ac3, A1, and Ms.
  • Measured-versus-simulated cycle overlay.
  • Root-mean-square error between normalized measured and simulated paths.

Candidate arrests are screening signals. Sensor lag, furnace control, section heat transfer, smoothing, recalescence, and process disturbances can produce similar signatures. Confirm transformations with metallography, dilatometry, hardness, or other validated evidence.

Release 3

Temperature-measurement assistant

Thermocouple mode

Select thermocouple type, wire/sheath diameter, attachment method, shielding, and thermal mass. Review estimated response time, stabilization time, and attachment-bias risk.

Infrared-pyrometer mode

Enter indicated temperature, instrument emissivity, estimated actual emissivity, reflected temperature, target width, spot diameter, and surface condition. Review the radiation-balance correction, target-to-spot ratio, and background contamination risk.

A precise display is not proof of an accurate workpiece temperature. Calibration, emissivity, scale, reflected radiation, sensor location, response lag, and furnace-to-workpiece differences must be controlled.

Release 4

Surface treatment and diffusion

Select carburizing, carbonitriding, nitriding, ferritic nitrocarburizing, induction hardening, flame hardening, or laser hardening.

Diffusion-controlled treatments use an Arrhenius diffusivity and complementary-error-function profile:

C(x,t) = C₀ + (Cs − C₀) erfc[x / (2√Dt)]

Review solute concentration, hardness versus depth, effective case depth, total affected depth, surface hardness, core hardness, and process-specific risks. Transformation-hardening modes estimate heat-penetration depth rather than solute diffusion.

Release 4

Tempering simulator

Enter steel response family, as-quenched hardness, tempering temperature, time, number of cycles, retained austenite, and post-temper cooling mode.

Hollomon–Jaffe parameter: P = TK [C + log10(t)]

Review tempered hardness, toughness recovery, residual-stress relief, retained-austenite reduction, secondary-hardening tendency, and embrittlement risk together. Do not assume hardness changes monotonically for every alloy family.

Release 4

Mechanical-property laboratory

Select microstructure, carbon, ASTM grain number, test temperature, notch severity, and residual stress. Switch among:

  • Engineering stress–strain curve
  • Charpy transition and DBTT curve
  • Fatigue S–N curve

The module provides directional yield strength, tensile strength, elongation, hardness, Charpy energy, fatigue strength, and elastic modulus, plus approximate HV/HBW/HRC learning conversions.

These values are not acceptance predictions. Test method, specimen geometry, orientation, strain rate, temperature, notch preparation, microstructure, and sampling location must be controlled.

Release 4

Virtual metallography laboratory

Generate schematic ferrite, ferrite–pearlite, bainite, martensite, spheroidite, and decarburization fields. Adjust grain size, magnification, etchant, banding, inclusion population, and section orientation.

Use the mystery-field exercise to practise phase and microconstituent identification. The displayed fields are original teaching schematics—not reference photomicrographs.

Real identification requires correct section location and orientation, specimen preparation, etchant, calibrated microscopy, reference images, and often hardness or compositional confirmation.

Release 4

Solidification and rolling inheritance

Use carbon, segregation tendency, thermal gradient, equiaxed nucleation, reduction ratio, soft reduction, cleanliness, and process-stage controls to animate:

Dendrites → segregation and porosity → rolling elongation → banding and anisotropy

Review segregation, porosity, closure, columnar-grain tendency, banding, and anisotropy indicators. Rolling can close voids and change morphology without eliminating inherited chemical segregation.

Release 4

Alloy-family modes

Plain and low-alloy steel

CE, Pcm, Ms, hardenability, weldability, and hydrogen-cracking trends.

Stainless steel

PREN, chromium and nickel equivalents, phase tendency, pitting trend, and sensitization screening.

Tool steel

Carbide, secondary-hardening, hot-hardness, wear, toughness, and cracking trends.

Cast iron / Fe–graphite

Carbon equivalent, graphitization, chill/carbide risk, matrix tendency, and graphite morphology.

Do not apply plain-carbon Fe–Fe3C logic uncritically to stainless steels, highly alloyed tool steels, or cast irons. Their phase stability and transformations require family-specific data and models.

Release 5

Reference diagrams

This tab holds two separate reference charts. Choose between them with the selector at the top of the panel. They share a carbon axis but not a coordinate system, so points do not carry across when you switch.

Which chart is which

ChartWhat it showsWhat it is not
Rapid-quench microconstituent mapThe constituent formed when austenite is quenched into an isothermal bath held at the temperature shown, from 0 to 1.2 wt% C.Not a TTT or CCT diagram. There is no time axis and nothing on it can be read as a cooling rate.
Iron-carbon / cementite phase diagramThe equilibrium Fe–Fe3C system to 6.68 wt% C, including liquid, delta ferrite, austenite, ferrite, cementite and graphite fields.Not a kinetic diagram. Bainite and martensite are not equilibrium phases and do not appear on it.

Keep the distinction in mind when reading results. The equilibrium diagram tells you what would form given unlimited time. The rapid-quench map tells you what actually forms when time is denied. Neither predicts a real quench on its own.

Plotting and moving points

  1. Use + Add point to create P2, P3, and as many further points as you need. Existing points stay visible.
  2. Select a point by clicking its P button in the list, or by clicking its marker.
  3. Drag any marker directly, or click anywhere inside the plot to move the active point there.
  4. Type exact values into the carbon and temperature fields for precise placement.
  5. Remove deletes the active point. At least one point is always kept.
  6. Reset examples restores the seeded points for the current chart.

Reading a region

Move the pointer over the diagram. The crosshair reports carbon content, temperature in both Celsius and Fahrenheit at once, and the interpreted region. The What does this region mean? panel updates as you move, covering what is present, how it forms, typical morphology, and the property tendencies that follow.

The painted colour and the reported region are generated from the same boundary functions, so the readout always matches the field you are pointing at.

Experience levels

LevelWhat you get
BeginnerPlain language and an immediate conclusion, with jargon kept out.
EngineerProcess implications, assumptions, property tendencies, and what still needs verifying.
AdvancedCalculation basis, model limitations, boundary assumptions, and data-validation cautions.

Critical lines and legend

Critical lines draws A1, A3, Acm, Ms and Mf on the rapid-quench map, and the eutectoid, eutectic, peritectic, liquidus and solidus on the poster. Labels toggles field and line annotation. Selecting a legend entry loads that region into the explanation panel. Regions are also reachable by keyboard: tab to one and press Enter.

Units

The °C and °F buttons change the display only. Internal values stay in Celsius, so a point does not move when you switch units. The poster's own printed scales remain in their original dual-unit form, since the artwork is reproduced unaltered.

Zoom, pan and full screen

Use the zoom buttons, or hold Ctrl and scroll. Pan by scrolling or dragging the diagram frame while zoomed. Fit returns to the whole chart and Full screen gives the diagram the entire viewport. Page scrolling is suppressed while you are manipulating the chart.

PNG export

Export PNG writes the diagram as currently displayed, including plotted points, visible overlays, critical-line emphasis and labels. Raster elements are embedded at export time, so the file is complete and self-contained. Attribution and the copyright line are included in the exported image and must not be removed.

On a phone

Controls stack into a single column and touch targets are enlarged. The poster is dense by design; use zoom and pan to inspect it rather than expecting the whole sheet to be legible at once. Poster artwork is only fetched when you open that chart, so the rapid-quench map stays fast on a mobile connection.

Engineering limitations

  • On the rapid-quench map, A1, A3, Acm, Ms and Mf are quantitative. Ms follows Andrews for plain carbon steel; alloying additions depress it and are not modelled.
  • Mf is drawn as a fixed offset below Ms. The real finish is asymptotic and retained austenite persists below the line, increasingly so at higher carbon.
  • The pearlite, bainite and austenitising divisions are educational approximations conveying field topology only. They carry no implied precision.
  • Below roughly 0.42 wt% C there is no lower bainite field, because Ms sits above the bainite divide and a quench past it forms martensite directly.
  • Real boundaries depend on chemistry, grain size, section size, homogeneity and holding time. Validate against grade-specific data before any process decision.

Source and copyright

The iron-carbon chart is the Iron-Carbon/Cementite Phase Diagram published by Buehler, an ITW company. Copyright © 2006 ASM International. All rights reserved. It is reproduced here under permission held by UpSkill Sprint Consulting and is served from this site rather than a third-party server. The artwork is reproduced unaltered; a link to the official PDF is provided beneath the diagram. Attribution and the copyright line must be preserved in any export or reuse.

The rapid-quench map is an original vector reconstruction. Its boundaries are generated from published relationships rather than traced from a source image.

Learning and records

Learn, save, share, and export

Learning mode

Generate phase-field challenges, use hints, inspect boundary explanations, and practise microstructure identification.

Save and share

  • Save scenario stores settings in the current browser.
  • Load saved restores the local scenario.
  • Copy share link embeds supported configuration data in the URL.

Uploaded raw process data remains local to the current browser session and is not embedded in the share link.

Export

  • Point and phase-analysis CSV
  • Equilibrium-diagram PNG
  • Derived process-data CSV
  • Downloadable process-analysis HTML report
  • Browser print/PDF output

Practical applications

Recommended workflows

Learn a phase transformation

Use Guided Start → Equilibrium → Path → TTT/CCT. Compare equilibrium phases with kinetic products.

Assess through-hardening

Enter chemistry → Austenitization → Quenching → Hardenability. Validate with hardness traverses.

Review a thermal record

Upload Process Data → map columns → calculate cooling rate → screen arrests → compare with the simulated path.

Investigate temperature discrepancy

Use Process Data → Measurement Assistant. Check lag, attachment, emissivity, field of view, and reflected radiation.

Evaluate surface treatment

Use Metallurgy Lab → Surface Treatment → set chemistry/time/temperature → inspect case and hardness depth → plan verification.

Explain property variation

Use Solidification → Metallography → Mechanical Lab to connect segregation, morphology, orientation, and test response.

Accuracy controls

Engineering cautions

  • Equilibrium versus kinetics: equilibrium phase fields do not predict transformation time or cooling-rate response.
  • Phase versus microconstituent: ferrite and cementite are phases; pearlite and bainite are microconstituents.
  • Model validity: empirical equations have chemistry and process ranges.
  • Section effects: centre and surface experience different thermal histories.
  • Measurement: sensor lag, attachment, emissivity, reflected radiation, and calibration can dominate the result.
  • Morphology: identical phase fractions can produce different properties when grain size, shape, distribution, and banding differ.
  • Alloy families: plain-carbon models are incomplete for stainless, tool steel, and cast iron.
  • Safety: the tool does not provide safe operating instructions for hazardous heat-treatment, atmosphere, quench, flame, induction, laser, or molten-salt processes.

Common issues

Troubleshooting

IssueLikely causeAction
Point will not move freelyBoundary snapping is enabled.Turn off Snap to critical boundaries.
Temperature appears to change after unit switchingThe displayed value was converted.The internal Celsius state is preserved.
Release 2–5 tab is missingCached JavaScript or incomplete load.Hard refresh the page and confirm all scripts are allowed.
Poster does not appearThe artwork is fetched only when that chart is opened.Wait for the loading notice to clear, then hard refresh if the status line reports an error.
Points vanish after switching chartsThe two charts use different carbon and temperature ranges.Expected. Each chart seeds its own example points.
Exported PNG is missing the micrographsA raster failed to embed during export.Re-run the export once the poster has fully loaded.
Crosshair region looks wrong near a boundaryPointer precision at high zoom.Zoom in further; the readout and the painted field are generated from the same functions and cannot disagree.
Uploaded file has no chartWrong delimiter, column mapping, or nonnumeric fields.Check delimiter, headers, time column, temperature column, and units.
Too many candidate arrestsNoise, low sensitivity threshold, or insufficient smoothing.Increase smoothing or reduce arrest sensitivity, then confirm against raw data.
Thermal record differs from simulated pathSensor location, lag, section heat transfer, transfer delay, or simplified path.Review measurement setup and update the cycle assumptions.
Microstructure does not resemble a real micrographThe field is schematic.Use qualified reference images and actual metallography.
Saved work is missingBrowser storage was cleared or another device was used.Use exports and share links for portable records.

Before relying on an output

Final checklist

  • Confirm chemistry and material family.
  • Confirm units and sensor calibration.
  • Separate equilibrium phases from kinetic products.
  • Document prior microstructure and grain condition.
  • Record section size, geometry, and sampling location.
  • Document heating, holding, transfer, cooling, and tempering history.
  • Check model and equation applicability.
  • Preserve raw process data and analysis settings.
  • Verify predictions using appropriate testing.
  • Include uncertainty and cautions in reports.
  • Use approved safety procedures.
  • Obtain technical approval where required.